Democrats Just RIGGED the 2026 Midterms - Trump Is Sounding the Alarm
President Trump gave a primetime speech in July and confirmed what Republicans have suspected for years now – there is massive voter fraud occurring in our country, and much, if not most, of it is taking place in Democrat-run states.
Of course, the libtard mainstream media and Democrats dismissed Trump’s revelations, which were evidence-based, not opinion-based, as false, misleading, and lies. Then this happened.
New Jersey admitted 6,600 noncitizens were on its voter rolls. Nearly 400 of them actually voted. Governor Sherrill refused to hand over the data to federal investigators. The DOJ sued to compel disclosure. And last Wednesday, Democrats got a big assist from one of Joe Biden’s DEI judicial hires: U.S. District Judge Zahid Quraishi dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice — meaning the DOJ can’t refile under the same legal theory.
Now let’s talk about who Zahid Quraishi is.
He is a Biden appointee. He has a documented donation history that leans into Democrats. He is the same judge who, in February 2026, accused the U.S. Attorney’s office in New Jersey of intentionally violating his immigration-related orders — saying it had “lost its credibility” and threatening to require sworn testimony from administration officials before every future immigration arrest. He previously said he would “not stand idly by” while what he characterized as government misconduct continued.
This is the man New Jersey’s voter roll case landed in front of. Coincidence? You make the call.
His actual legal reasoning — that New Jersey’s computerized voter registration list falls outside the scope of the Civil Rights Act of 1960’s inspection provision — should not survive appeal. The DOJ’s “expansive interpretation” of Title III, as Quraishi framed it, was rejected, but by a blatant judicial partisan. The Trump administration will almost certainly appeal. They will probably find a more receptive audience at the Third Circuit than they did at this particular district court.
Now, let’s be clear about what this ruling actually does in practice. It buys New Jersey time. It keeps the voter roll data out of federal hands for the foreseeable future. It prevents investigators from finding out whether the 6,600 confirmed noncitizen registrations are the tip of the iceberg or the bulk of it — which, given that New Jersey has had automatic voter registration since 2018 and Democratic Gov. Mikie Sherrill’s admission covered only a single year of data, is a question that cannot be honestly answered without access to the full database.
Sherrill called those 6,600 noncitizens “citizens of New Jersey” when explaining why she wouldn’t turn over their information. The IDEMIA software company contradicted her “software error” explanation by pointing out that state election officials manually approved those registrations. The DOJ set a deadline. Sherrill missed it. A judge Sherrill’s team argued before — appointed by the president who appointed Sherrill’s predecessor — dismissed the lawsuit.
And now, even Politico is admitting that, yeah, it’s pretty easy for non-citizens to game the system to vote in our elections:
Even so, every other court that has considered the DOJ’s voter roll access theory has ruled against it, Quraishi noted — seventeen district courts and a federal appeals court. That’s a significant legal obstacle, and the Trump administration needs to find a different legal theory or a different vehicle to get this data.
Harmeet Dhillon said they’d get it anyway. She needs to find a way to make good on that.
The appeal clock is running. November is 97 days away. What’s in New Jersey’s voter rolls matters enormously — which is precisely why New Jersey is fighting so hard to keep them hidden.
The Media Is Big Mad That Trump Didn’t Tell Them He Was Dodging an Iranian Assassination Plot
In July, U.S. intelligence had credible information of a threat against President Donald Trump’s life as he was preparing to depart the NATO meeting in Turkey. He boarded a secret military jet — reportedly by entering through a catering truck — and left safely. The operation worked. The president is alive.
But now the media is furious they weren’t informed in advance. Not even kidding. They are legit big mad.
Let’s sit with that for a moment. The press corps is upset that the Secret Service didn’t brief them on the classified security protocols for a classified operation designed to prevent the assassination of the President of the United States. They are outraged that they were not told exactly where the president would be and exactly what vehicle he would use to escape an Iranian kill team.
The Washington Post’s contribution to this coverage was to point out that Bill Clinton did something similar during a 1999 Pakistan trip — but crucially, a White House press official briefed the White House Correspondents’ Association president off the record so that at least one journalist knew the president wouldn’t be on Air Force One. But that was a different time. Back then, a couple of journalists, at least, could be trusted with such information. And after all, Clinton is a Democrat, like most of them.
The media presents this as an example Trump should have followed. What it actually is: proof of exactly why he didn’t. One journalist knowing is one journalist who could leak it thanks to their Trump Derangement Syndrome. One leak in that environment is one dead president. The Clinton comparison doesn’t help the media’s argument. It confirms Trump’s judgment.
This is the same press corps that ran classified munitions data last week in a CBS News report — information the Trump administration called treasonous and said the leakers were being hunted. This is the same media ecosystem that ran the five-reporter MSNBC story alleging Kash Patel was about to be fired, built entirely on anonymous sources, that turned out to be false. This is the press corps that published advance details about a planned Marine Corps helicopter flight in a story about JD Vance’s security detail, details that caused the flight to be canceled.
townhall
And the question these people are asking is: why didn’t Trump tell us where he was going?
Scott Jennings answered it with a precision that should be mandatory viewing: because telling the press would have meant telling everyone who monitors the press. In an environment where Iranian operatives are actively planning assassination attempts against the president, “let’s brief the journalists” is not a security protocol. It is a liability.
Trump attended the NATO meeting despite the threat. He showed up. He did the work. He got out safely. The people who were supposed to keep that information secure kept it secure.
The catering truck worked. The president came home. The media is writing outrage pieces about not being invited along.
As RedState’s Matt Vespa put it: “We weren’t told” should be met with a shoulder shrug. The safety and security of the President of the United States is far more important than the comfort of the press corps. Full stop.
Trump Just Got Revenge On An Indiana ‘Republican’ Who Balked At Redistricting — and This One Stings
President Trump’s record of helping MAGA challengers dispense with RINOs this election cycle remains stellar, the latest example occurring in the Hoosier state.
The Indiana state Senate race that went to a recount has a winner: Paula Copenhaver, Trump-endorsed challenger to incumbent Spencer Deery, won by three votes. The same margin Deery thought he had before the recount. A six-vote swing on a single recount determined the outcome. This is how accountability works in Republican primaries.
Deery was one of a slate of Indiana state senators who blocked Trump’s push to redraw Indiana’s congressional map ahead of the midterms. He paid for that decision the way Republicans who cross Trump on his signature legislative priorities tend to pay — with a primary challenger, a presidential endorsement going to that challenger, and a loss to the Trump-backed challenger.
The redistricting fight mattered for a specific reason beyond Indiana’s borders. Republicans need every structural advantage they can build before November, and a favorable congressional map in a reliably red state is exactly that kind of advantage. The senators who blocked it weren’t protecting some noble institutional principle. They were protecting their personal relationships with the incumbents who would have lost districts under the new map. Trump noticed. He sent in the cavalry. The cavalry won.
Deery’s response to losing the recount is instructive — and a little ironic. He accused the Indiana Recount Commission of trying to “undermine the will of voters” by treating ballots differently based on “whether they furthered the president’s political goals.” He said the commission “does not get the last word” and refused to concede.
Let’s note what we’re looking at here. The man who blocked a redistricting effort that his own party’s president supported is now refusing to accept a recount result and claiming the process is rigged. The media spent years telling us that challenging election results was the most dangerous threat to American democracy. It will be interesting to see how many of those same outlets rush to cover Spencer Deery’s refusal to accept his recount loss. Don’t hold your breath.
The Indiana Senate President Pro Tem — who also blocked redistricting — chose not to seek reelection as leader after watching what happened to his colleagues. He saw which way the wind was blowing. Deery apparently did not.
The broader lesson is the one that makes Republican legislators in every state nervous right now: Trump is willing to come into your primary, put his name on a challenger, and fight it out vote by vote if you cross him on something he considers essential. Three votes. A six-vote swing on a recount. It doesn’t get more personal than that.
The Hoosier bloodbath is now complete. Except for Deery’s appeal, apparently. Because some Republicans still haven’t learned what happens when you fight the recount after losing one.
GOP Sen. Mike Rounds Wins South Dakota Senate Primary
South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds defeated entrepreneur Justin McNeal on Tuesday night in the Republican primary.
Rounds, the former governor of South Dakota, is seeking a third term in the U.S. Senate.
Rounds advances to face off against former South Dakota highway patrolman Julian Beaudion, who is running unopposed in the Democratic primary.
Rounds has the endorsement of President Donald Trump and cosponsored the Save America Act in January of 2026, along with Sen. Mike Lee and Rep. Chip Roy.
Rounds has frequently described it as “common sense legislation” that requires proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections and requires a photo ID to vote.
On the Senate floor, he also urged his colleagues to back the bill, stressing voter integrity and that elections should be decided only by U.S. residents.
“Free and fair elections are a foundation of our democracy. Part of that fairness is making sure only United States citizens are voting for our leaders,” said Rounds.
“This rule has been loosely enforced in blue states for far too long. I’m pleased to be joining Senator Lee on this legislation which requires proof of citizenship in order to register to vote,” Rounds added.
Rounds has been very vocal this year with his support of the Save America Act.
“The SAVE America Act, which I am a cosponsor of, is common sense legislation,” Rounds declared.
“You’re required to show your ID when you start a new job, go to an R rated movie, buy an alcoholic beverage and shovel snow in New York. Requiring identification to vote in federal elections is a reasonable standard. Pass the SAVE America Act,” Rounds wrote on his Facebook in March 2026.
In a Senate floor speech in March, he demanded that only citizens vote in U.S. elections.
“I rise today in support of the Save America Act legislation that I’ve co-sponsored to make certain that only US citizens are voting in our elections,” Rounds said.
“This legislation will require proof of citizenship in our elections and it would require that this citizenship be identified when registering to vote and a valid [photo ID to vote],” Rounds added.
Rounds has called the Save America Act a “no-brainer” and emphasized enforcement of existing laws.
Republican National Committee Chairman Joe Gruters says Republicans may outspend Democrats this election cycle, a dramatic reversal from past campaigns where Democrats often held the fundraising advantage.
Speaking on Breitbart, Gruters argued Republicans are entering the midterm cycle with significantly stronger financial positioning and unprecedented coordination across the conservative movement.
Gruters painted a bleak financial picture for Democrats.
“The DNC has minus 4 million [dollars], and it wasn’t the DNC that plowed $70 million: It was the collective,” Gruters said.
“So, if you look at the collective on the right, we may have $800 million,” he continued.
“The collective on the left may have $350 million, and when you have the court, there’s gonna be a court case that is ruled on in the next week or two, coordinated campaign limits, which will magnify that, which will allow full coordination and allow the parties to spend at the candidate rate, which is massive for us,” he said.
May you like
According to Gruters, the RNC itself is in far stronger shape than the Democratic National Committee.
He said the RNC currently has “about $125 million” on hand compared to what he described as negative cash reserves at the DNC.
