Kash Patel Exposes Joe Biden - Mind-Boggling Corruption Hidden by FBI
Kash Patel Exposes Joe Biden - Mind-Boggling Corruption Hidden by FBI
Posted August 15, 2026 · 6 min read
Declassified FBI Records Raise Questions About Alleged Operation Regarding Biden Corruption Claims
Reports indicate the White House Government Transparency Task Force released declassified FBI records Wednesday that conservative critics argue confirm their previous assertions: the FBI allegedly ran a coordinated operation to label what they claim is real Biden corruption evidence as Russian disinformation.
The operation was called “Round River.” Observers note FBI analysts launched it during the 2020 election under the mandate of fighting “malign foreign influence.” Critics claim what it actually did was function as the mirror image of Crossfire Hurricane — arguing that where Crossfire Hurricane investigated Trump-Russia collusion, Round River dismissed documented Biden family corruption allegations by stamping “Russian disinformation” on anyone who touched it.
Media reports show a recovered FBI spreadsheet cataloged more than six dozen Americans, foreigners, and organizations tied to the Biden-Ukraine controversy. Democrats — including the Bidens, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Barack Obama, and George Soros — were labeled “targets” of Russian disinformation, observers note. Conservatives investigating the Bidens — Fox News, One America News, Rudy Giuliani, and Michael Caputo — were reportedly branded “conduits” spreading it. Trump’s own Cabinet officials — Bill Barr and Mike Pompeo — were on the conduit list, analysts point out. So were Republican senators Grassley, Johnson, and Graham, along with Devin Nunes and Jim Jordan, who had sought to investigate whether the Biden corruption allegations were accurate.
Conservative commentators argue this list suggests the FBI was running a counterintelligence operation designed to discredit those — including sitting Cabinet members and United States senators — who were investigating the Biden family corruption allegations.
Reports indicate three confidential informants corroborated the Ukraine corruption allegations. One, reporting since 2012, described a Russian intelligence officer’s account of Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky allegedly using Hunter Biden to get closer to the Americans as part of a long-term operation. Another described alleged $100 million bribes and CIA pressure on Ukrainian prosecutors to drop the Burisma case, reports show. A third reportedly had direct contact with Hunter Biden himself. Critics argue every one of them was retroactively labeled as a Russian asset and their information was dismissed.
Media reports note FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed he shut down the Foreign Influence Task Force and is reviewing whether Round River was used to undermine ongoing investigations by focusing selectively on Biden-Ukraine rather than providing a balanced picture of all foreign threats.
Political analysts suggest this raises questions about the origins of the narrative surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop, when 51 intelligence officials signed a letter calling it Russian disinformation. Conservative critics argue they did so because the FBI had a running operation guiding them to. They further claim that anyone who questioned Biden-Ukraine corruption was labeled a Kremlin conduit because Round River built the infrastructure to do exactly that.
Observers note conservative commentators conclude that Crossfire Hurricane unfairly targeted Trump, while Round River dismissed allegations to protect Biden, asserting that this is no longer just a conspiracy theory.
AFTER ABDUL EL-SAYED WINS SENATE RACE, FETTERMAN MAKES HUGE ANNOUNCEMENT.
Fetterman Criticizes Democratic Trajectory Amid Concerns Over Far-Left Influence
Reports indicate Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman issued a sharp rebuke to his own party Tuesday, cautioning that Democrats are drifting toward what critics describe as radical extremes by elevating socialist and communist-aligned figures whose views observers note clash with core American and Democratic principles.
Media reports note that speaking to Fox News on the sidelines of the Israel on Campus Coalition’s National Leadership Summit in Washington, D.C., the senator zeroed in on the rising influence of far-left streamer Hasan Piker.
Observers point out Piker, who commands millions of followers on Twitch, has openly praised Chinese communist leader Mao Zedong and defended Cuba’s authoritarian regime while blaming the United States for the island’s hardships.
Reports indicate he has also backed New York City’s socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani and campaigned alongside progressive Michigan Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed.
“I would never try to elevate … a communist just because [Piker] has followers on some, on Twitch, whatever that is,” Fetterman said.
“But overall, if you identify with a communist who praises Mao and Cuba and for these places, that should be foreign to any Democrat. Without a doubt, that’s having an impact,” Fetterman added.
Political analysts note Fetterman described the party’s overall trajectory as “troubling,” pointing to Tuesday’s primaries as a critical test of whether Democrats will keep elevating candidates from the progressive fringe.
Reports show that in Missouri, moderate Rep. Wesley Bell defeated a comeback bid by DSA-backed former Rep. Cori Bush.
In Michigan’s closely watched Democratic Senate primary, media reports note El-Sayed—who has courted socialist support—remained locked in a tight race with more centrist Rep. Haley Stevens as results continued to come in early Wednesday.
The senator argued that anti-Israel positions have become an “ultimate litmus” test within the party’s left wing, observers note.
Reports indicate he singled out California Gov. Gavin Newsom for describing Israel as an “apartheid state,” insisting Newsom “knows better, that that’s not true.”
“I see the midterms right now that the more radical, the more anti-Israel,” Fetterman said.
Fetterman stressed that it should be “pretty obvious” Democrats must avoid pandering to the fringe, political analysts note.
“Those are core values. … Like I said, you just can’t pander to those kinds of people,” Fetterman said.
Observers note Fetterman stated that even pro-Israel Democrats now face pressure to qualify their support.
“The left is using the term of Zionist as like a slur or use Zio or Zio, or describing that as someone that in the negative terms,” he explained.
“In other words, being proud, pro-Israel, that’s become a slur, and people have to defend that,” Fetterman said.
Political analysts point out the event itself underscored the stakes.
Reports indicate more than 800 pro-Israel students gathered for training, networking, and discussions on combating antisemitism and strengthening the U.S.-Israel alliance on college campuses.
Media reports note Fetterman used the platform to reinforce his consistent support for the Jewish state amid what he sees as a broader party shift.
Observers note President Donald Trump has issued parallel warnings.
In June, after socialists scored primary wins in New York, reports show Trump declared that Democrats had moved past socialism into something darker: “These are not social Democrats. These are hardcore, godless communists. They’re godless communists. All communists are godless. They don’t believe in God. This is the most serious threat to our country since its existence. In my opinion, 250 years ago. This is a major threat to our country.”
Asked late Tuesday what more socialist primary victories would mean, reports indicate Trump called the Democratic Party “a mess.”
“I think they should form another party, the communist of America party. I think they should have a new party, the communists of America, and it will do well, it’ll get about 10% of the vote,” he said.
Political analysts note Fetterman further highlighted his independent streak on foreign policy, noting he was the only Senate Democrat to support the Trump administration’s strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Reports indicate he has also stood alone among Democrats in opposing certain War Powers resolutions on the issue.
Report this article
Select a reason for reporting:
Inaccurate information Copyright violation Spam / advertisement Offensive content Other '; footer.hidden = true; overlay.hidden = false; document.body.style.overflow = 'hidden'; } function hideSection() { if (section) section.hidden = true; } function openModal() { if (alreadyReported) { showSuccess(); return; } overlay.hidden = false; document.body.style.overflow = 'hidden'; } function closeModal() { overlay.hidden = true; document.body.style.overflow = ''; footer.hidden = false; overlay.querySelectorAll('input[name="report_reason"]').forEach(function(r) { r.checked = false; }); document.getElementById('reportMessage').value = ''; errorBox.hidden = true; submitBtn.disabled = false; submitBtn.textContent = 'Submit report'; imageItems = []; imgGrid.innerHTML = ''; updateAttachBtn(); } btn.addEventListener('click', openModal); closeBtn.addEventListener('click', closeModal); cancelBtn.addEventListener('click', closeModal); overlay.addEventListener('click', function(e) { if (e.target === overlay) closeModal(); }); document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (!overlay.hidden && e.key === 'Escape') closeModal(); }); // --- Error helper --- function showError(msg) { errorBox.textContent = msg; errorBox.hidden = false; } // --- Submit --- submitBtn.addEventListener('click', function() { var selected = overlay.querySelector('input[name="report_reason"]:checked'); if (!selected) { showError('Please select a reason.'); return; } errorBox.hidden = true; submitBtn.disabled = true; var itemsToUpload = imageItems.filter(function(it) { return !it.uploadedUrl; }); if (itemsToUpload.length === 0) { doSubmit(selected.value); return; } submitBtn.textContent = 'Uploading…'; var done = 0, failed = 0; itemsToUpload.forEach(function(entry) { entry.statusEl.textContent = '…'; entry.statusEl.className = 'report-img-item__status'; entry.statusEl.hidden = false; resizeImage(entry.file, MAX_LONG_PX, function(resized) { uploadFile(resized, currentSlug, function(err, url) { done++; if (err) { failed++; entry.statusEl.textContent = 'Failed'; entry.statusEl.className = 'report-img-item__status err'; } else { entry.uploadedUrl = url; entry.statusEl.textContent = '✓'; entry.statusEl.className = 'report-img-item__status done'; } if (done === itemsToUpload.length) { if (failed > 0) { showError('Could not upload ' + failed + ' image(s). Remove the failed ones (red) or submit without them.' ); submitBtn.disabled = false; submitBtn.textContent = 'Submit report'; } else { doSubmit(selected.value); } } }); }); }); }); function doSubmit(reason) { submitBtn.textContent = 'Sending…'; var uploadedUrls = imageItems .map(function(it) { return it.uploadedUrl; }) .filter(Boolean); var payload = { reason: reason, message: document.getElementById('reportMessage').value.trim(), post_slug: currentSlug, post_url: window.location.href }; if (uploadedUrls.length) payload.image_urls = uploadedUrls; fetch('/api/post-report', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Requested-With': 'XMLHttpRequest' }, body: JSON.stringify(payload) }) .then(function(r) { return r.json(); }) .then(function(data) { if (data && data.ok) { markReported(currentSlug); alreadyReported = true; bodyEl.innerHTML = '✓ Thank you for your report.'; footer.hidden = true; setTimeout(function() { closeModal(); footer.hidden = false; hideSection(); }, 2000); } else { showError((data && data.message) ? data.message : 'Something went wrong. Please try again.'); submitBtn.disabled = false; submitBtn.textContent = 'Submit report'; } }) .catch(function() { showError('Connection failed. Please try again.'); submitBtn.disabled = false; submitBtn.textContent = 'Submit report'; }); } })();Comments 0
Posting as GuestCBS Host LOSES IT After Sen. Kennedy FACT CHECKS Her Trump LIES… THIS GOT BAD!...
CBS Host PRESSES John Kennedy on Trump’s Spending — His Answer Takes an Unexpected Turn
The interview began with some of the biggest questions facing Washington: the conflict with Iran, rising fuel costs, and the approaching midterm elections. But when Republican Senator John Kennedy appeared on Face the Nation with CBS host Margaret Brennan, the conversation quickly moved toward an issue that could shape the political debate for months to come: how the government spends taxpayers’ money.
Kennedy did not pretend that the economic pressure facing American families was insignificant. He argued that voters were far more concerned about the cost of living than the daily battles playing out on television. With oil prices affected by disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz, he said, the consequences of foreign policy were reaching directly into household budgets.
Kennedy Brings the Conversation Back to Affordability
Kennedy’s message to the White House was unusually direct. He predicted that the midterm elections would be close and argued that Republicans needed to keep their attention on the financial concerns of ordinary Americans.
“When moms and dads lie down to sleep at night and can't,” Kennedy told Brennan, they are worried about the cost of living.
He also called for a nationwide address explaining why the United States entered the conflict with Iran, what the administration hoped to achieve, and how it intended to bring the situation to a conclusion.
His position was not a blanket rejection of the administration’s strategy. Kennedy defended continued pressure on Iran while acknowledging the economic consequences of the partially closed strait. He opposed sending American troops into the situation, warning that deploying them could create a new set of problems.
That combination—support for pressure abroad alongside concern about prices at home—set the tone for the rest of the interview.
Nearly $1 Billion in Cuts Sparks a Constitutional Dispute
The conversation became more pointed when Brennan asked about the White House’s decision to cancel nearly $1 billion in previously approved federal funding without congressional consent.
Brennan raised concerns expressed by Senator Susan Collins, the Republican chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, who argued that the move threatened Congress’s constitutional authority over federal spending.
Kennedy disagreed.
“I love Susan like a taco, but she's wrong,” he said before explaining his view that Congress often appropriates money in broad categories, leaving agencies with considerable discretion over how funds are ultimately used.
He then deployed the phrase that would become the interview’s most memorable sound bite: “Spending porn.”
Kennedy used the expression to criticize what he considers wasteful government expenditures, pointing to funding for circumcision programs in Zambia and electric buses in Rwanda. He also argued that Congress should take greater responsibility for identifying and eliminating spending it believes is unnecessary.
But the disagreement was about more than whether particular programs were worthwhile. It raised a larger question: when Congress approves funding, how much authority should the executive branch have to cancel or redirect it?
Kennedy defended the cuts, while Brennan’s question highlighted the legal and constitutional objections. The interview did not resolve that dispute, but it brought the competing arguments into sharp focus.
Then Kennedy Turned the Standard on Trump
The most revealing moment came when Brennan shifted from the proposed cuts to taxpayer-funded advertising.
She asked Kennedy about a government-funded commercial prominently featuring President Donald Trump and praising his leadership. The question echoed earlier controversy surrounding former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whose department had spent $220 million on a border-security advertising campaign in which she appeared prominently.
Kennedy had previously criticized Noem’s campaign. Now, with Trump featured in another advertisement paid for by the federal government, Brennan asked whether that spending was appropriate.
Kennedy’s response was notable because he explicitly included his own political allies—and himself—in the principle he was defending.
“I don't think any public official, including President Trump or Kristi Noem or John Kennedy, should spend public money on private ads for themselves,” he said.
He acknowledged that the White House viewed the issue differently but argued that public funds should not be used to promote individual politicians. He also suggested that politicians should not have buildings named after them while they are still alive.
That answer complicated any attempt to portray his position as simply a defense of the administration. Kennedy supported the proposed spending cuts, but he also applied his criticism of taxpayer-funded self-promotion to Trump.
The Real Takeaway From the Interview
The exchange was not a shouting match, nor does the published transcript establish that Brennan lost her composure or that Kennedy fact-checked a series of false statements from her. What it does show is a pointed discussion about economic priorities, congressional spending authority, and whether public money should be used to enhance a politician’s image.
Kennedy’s argument was straightforward: families are worried about affordability, government spending deserves scrutiny, and the rules should apply regardless of party.
Whether viewers agree with his assessment of the proposed cuts is a separate question. The legal dispute over executive spending authority and the debate over taxpayer-funded political advertising deserve examination beyond a few memorable television lines.
The moment worth watching is when Brennan moves from criticizing government spending in general to asking Kennedy about an advertisement featuring Trump himself. That is where the discussion becomes more complicated—and where Kennedy’s stated principle is tested against his own party’s leadership.
Watch the full interview through the link below to hear the exchange in context and decide how convincing each side’s argument really was.
